What changed from cw-v1

Known biases

Coverage

Ratings reflect sourced public evidence we track; private or unavailable activity may be absent.

Survivorship

Companies and outcomes that stop generating evidence can be underrepresented.

Publication

Only policy-qualified public evidence enters a public profile, which favors verifiable claims.

Sector classification

Sector context depends on a versioned cohort and falls back to absolute evidence when the cohort is thin.

Financial comparability

Reported financial periods, currencies, restatements, and accounting choices can limit comparison.

Changelog

Every published score names its methodology version. A version bump appears here — silent re-scoring is the credibility-killer.

• cw-v2.2 current 2026-07

  Exposure reads the structural capability relation, not sentiment alone.

  • Substitution and margin-compression assessments now lower exposure below what impact direction alone can express.
  • A helping relation raises nothing on its own: positive positioning still has to be earned by impacts.
  • An unresolved relation widens the published exposure range instead of asserting a neutral score.
  • Ratings computed under cw-v2.1 are retained unchanged; the two versions are not comparable.

• cw-v2.1 superseded 2026-07

  Evidence-weighted multidimensional durability profile with explicit abstention and sensitivity.

  • Separated exposure, adaptation, monetization, defensibility, management execution, and financial resilience.
  • Made missing inputs unknown and withheld the aggregate unless coverage gates pass.
  • Added bounded sector context, evidence-strength attenuation, and public sensitivity ranges.
  • Scored exposure from impact direction only, so displacement and mild bad news landed alike.

• cw-v1 superseded 2026-07

  Legacy scalar impact rollup retained for reproducibility and comparison.

  • Combined live impact direction, magnitude, and confidence around a neutral baseline of 50.
  • Included a founded-before-2008 proxy that cw-v2 removes.

FAQ

Is the rating a prediction?

No. It is a speculative assessment of sourced evidence, not a forecast, valuation, or investment recommendation.

Why can a profile have no overall number?

Century Worth withholds the aggregate when coverage or evidence gates fail. Known dimensions remain visible without filling missing inputs with 50.

Why show a range?

Rubric anchors are judgments, not physical measurements. The range shows how adjacent defensible inputs and sector context could change the aggregate.

What happened to cw-v1?

It remains stored and reproducible as a legacy comparison. cw-v2 never overwrites or relabels it.

Can I rely on this for investing?

No. Century Worth records correlation and assessment from public evidence; it is not financial advice or a buy, sell, or hold signal.